Comments on: Don’t Bother the Monolithic, Antiquated Newspaper, Honey, It’s Too Busy Forsaking Journalistic Integrity In Favor of Sensationalized Perpetuation of Misinformation

By: Kathryn

Kathryn — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:10:53 +0000

Paige – i had to click on the link to NY Times to see the title to which you were referring. It isn't listed here & you raised my curiosity – for the title anyway. Didn't bother with the article. You're right, the title itself is offensive & gives enough foreshadowing of their bias so that i wouldn't bother with it. Always enjoy your "snark."

By: Paige

Paige — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:49:47 +0000

lol, thanks melodie! I didn't know what I could offer since others had discussed it so eloquently already. Thougth I'd add some snark!

By: Melodie

Melodie — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:35:11 +0000

Well, I think you win hands down for best rebuttal post title Paige. You rock!

By: Dionna @Code Name: M

Dionna @Code Name: M — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:31:13 +0000

Amen, Paige. Just . . . amen.You hit the nail on the head about the fact that we can't win.

By: niobe

niobe — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:47:59 +0000

I'm totally with you on the intentionally provacative nature of the piece.

By: The Red Headed Mama

The Red Headed Mama — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:37:16 +0000

::like::I've seen this topic pop up on a few of the blogs I read so last night I caved and read the article. Jared was next to me and even he laughed and found it ridiculous (even though he admittedly doesn't get the whole "blog" thing)